
In this paper the changing
landscape of children, culture and media in the United States of America (US)
and Europe is compared, contrasted and discussed. Articles from the Encyclopedia
of Children and Childhood serve as point of departure to outline the development
of modern classic media such as comic books, radio, television and film back to
the 18th century. The second half of the paper reflects on the organisation of
media in the business and strategic hub of the Middle East, Dubai. Attention is
given to the differences and commonalities in application of current mediating
technologies amongst Arab/Emirati children and expatriate children, otherwise referred
to as Third Culture Kids (TCK’s). Even though the meaning of childhood is
continuously changing through time, across places and social context, children from
these three regions share a common pattern balancing time between school, friends
and family, and accompany a good deal of this with media. This paper illustrates
the dual nature of media, explaining how media fit into the lives of children,
what place it occupy (media-centred approach) and at the same time how children
utilise media in their daily lives (child-centred approach). A new sociology of
childhood proposes that children are actively constructing their own social
lives and peer cultures and are no longer only understood through adult
assumptions. Therefore the central thesis of the paper put media in context
following a child-centred approach.
The 18th century signified the
replacement of manual labour by new inventions and machinery in the
industrialised world. Central to this period was also the development of modern
childhood. A demographic shift took place with the decline in the mortality
rate and parents became more affectionate towards their children as they no
longer were an emotional burden (Robert et al 2004). Modern media developed parallel
to modern childhood and continue to hold a vital position in the lives of children
both as a “set of concrete technologies”
in which it differentiate children according to access and application, as well
as a “set of symbolic meaning making
processes”, connecting people, periods and places (Drotner 2004, p.584). Ballads,
broadsides and chapbooks carrying emotive topics aimed at an adult readership
during the French Revolution of 1789, also reached a young audience. Media
simultaneously unite and divide children, shape children and is shaped by them.
These relations between media and children evidently evoke adult reaction,
debate and discourse on social and cultural norms. Religious groups and
educationalists in Europe and the US spoke out against popular fictions. The
universality of media, how quickly information reaches the masses worldwide,
power struggles and children as vulnerable beings, were emphasised through this
early development of media (Drotner 2004). Industrialisation and urbanisation during
the 19th century set the basis for a wider juvenile readership of
printed books catering for lower-, middle- and upper-class children. By the end
of the 19th century the magazine market diversified too and catered
to children of all ages, including the very young. Discussion took on a more
optimistic perspective with adults realising the beneficial effects of reading
(Drotner 2004).
Audio-visual media such as film,
radio and television took over from print media during the 20th
century. Radio programmes in the 1930’s and 1940’s broadcast children specific
content, enjoyed by children of all ages. The introduction of crime and horror topics
in comics in the 1950’s became an emotive topic amongst adults who already felt
strongly against crime, alcohol, drugs and sex portrayed in film and television
which rapidly became mass media with children (Breuning 2004; Rydin 2004). In
both Europe and the US it was argued that the use of pictures in comics left
too much room for violent graphic gore and sexual imagery, that the words and
pictures content in comics threatened not only literacy of children but also
morals and morality. The Comics Code Authority (CCA) and the Motion Picture
Producers and Distributors of America (MPPDA) were established in the US as
forms of self-governing censorship to ensure not only wholesome content for
families but also commercial enterprise. Whilst Europe showcased a strong
tradition of public regulation and reform for the public good with the aim to
inform, educate and entertain, the ultimate aim of industry regulated
censorship in the US was consumerism (Drotner 2004). At the same time concern
and later moral panic arose regarding the role of radio in the lives of
children. It was recognised that
teenagers preferred listening to the radio thus providing opportunity for
educational radio stations in the US to obtain licenses for classroom
broadcasting. Radio in Europe on the other hand were organised as nationwide
networks, held social and cultural policy implications and eventually gained
place in social welfare policy (Lindgren 2004). Radio became the leading
contender in recognising children as actors in their own social worlds, placing
children as active agent on the map.
Film and television hold educational
value since it provide an insight into life and society in general and assist
children in some cases to ease pain and overcome challenging situations
(Breuning 2004; Rydin 2004). Movies bring stories to live with moving images. Television
introduced gradually after World War II in Europe and the US rapidly gained
popularity and by the 1970’s the majority of households had at least one television
set and eventually replaced radio as the medium host used by younger children. At
this point it is interesting to note that the television market was more
regulated in Europe than the US and in both regions was popular especially
amongst the younger ages. Differences also occurred within Europe with England
opposing children acting in television programmes whilst children in Sweden
played central roles in the production of programmes. Children remained mainly
underrepresented with little voice worldwide bar the portrayal of a sweet
wholesome image for the sake of advertising (Rydin 2004). Furthermore time spent
watching television varied significantly between countries depending on both
society as well as production; and researchers concluded that children do not
react uniformly to the same programmes (Rydin 2004). This reinforces the role
of cultural relativism in addition to universalism in gaining an understanding of
the relationship between media, culture and children.
The superhero genre with main
characters such as Batman and Superman reinvigorated in comics in the 1960’s,
gained countercultural relevance, influenced youth movements and eventually
challenged CCA restrictions resulting in a lesser control after the codes were
revised in 1989 (Kannenberg 2004; Breuning 2004). Opening of new bookshops gave
rise to alternative comics with more focus on children whilst Hollywood turned
to comic characters for source material to produce films. A significant moment
in the child/media relationship took place in Europe in 1958 when a
psychologist published results from a child-centred study “. . . which asked what individual children did with media rather than
what media did to children” (Drotner 2004, p. 588). By the 1960’s the
learning and social benefits of television was recognised by the US, Europe and
developing nations in regions such as South America.
By the 21
st century
questions regarding children, culture and media were still being asked. The current
organisation of media in Dubai is highly interesting and remarkably very little
research on this topic has thus far been conducted with children as rightful
and competent research participants within media debate and discourse. Two very
distinct groups of children live side by side in Dubai namely a minority 20%
local Arab/Emirati children following the national curriculum of the UAE at
schools catering for locals only; and a majority 80% TCK’s attending the
various international curriculum private schools. The organisation of media amongst these two
groups illustrate that application of media can never be totally universal, nor
totally cultural but seek to strike a balance riding the edge of a double edged
sword. Both Emiratis as well as TCK’s are highly adept at using new as well as
traditional media and spent considerable time and money consuming and investing
in new media. This is incidentally also linked to the society being mainly a
high income one opposed to other Arab societies within the region such as
Jordan that is mainly middle and low income.
TCK’s are more adept at
producing
media content socially and educationally across platforms and devices. On the internet they do so via blogging,
micro-blogging, streaming sites, micro-sharing, podcasting and social
networking utilising sites such as Facebook, Twitter, mxit, tumblr, ning and
pbs works amongst many others. Emirati children prefer to utilise language
other than their native tongue whilst TCK’s are adept at producing media with
equal ease in their mother tongue as well as in English, the
lingua franca (Melki 2010). TCK’s in Dubai not only use media for
entertainment, networking, connectivity and education, but remarkably also for
current affairs and expressing opinion, positioning them firmly on the global
map. Television, mobile texting, e-mailing and online social networking remain
the media of choice among Emirati children.
Recent suspension of Blackberry
services in Dubai due to security concerns and regulation raised great protest
amongst children and adolescents in Dubai.
The UAE National Media Council is the highest authority in Dubai
controlling access to media and even though Dubai promotes itself as a country
with freedom of press, access to media remain government regulated and heavily
censored. TCK’s and their families apply
virtual private networks (VPN’s) in order to gain access to Voice over Internet
Protocol (VOIP) such as Skype and other internet based media. VPN internet
sites are incidentally also deemed inaccessible by the Telecommunications
Regulatory Authority of the United Arab Emirates although the establishment of
new VPN sites leave a small gap for access. According to Melki (2010) Emirati children
portray weak levels of media and news literacy and strong levels of new media
adoption and technological knowledge. In
contrast TCK’s portray very strong levels of media and news literacy, socially
as well as in the classroom. Neigh in Gray-Block (2003, p1) makes a profound
statement about the lives and experiences of TCK’s:
“The benefits for children
include their development of a three-dimensional view of the world in which
media images of different countries carry greater depth. TCK’s have a tangible link to such images and a greater
sensitivity to the world in which they live.”
To conclude: the most pertinent
question regarding media, culture and children in the 21st century
concerns children’s rights – the rights to privacy, freedom of expression and
access to diversity of media. Within a socio-cultural context the main
arguments concern discourse of pessimism and optimism; protection and rights;
and citizenship and consumerism (Drotner 2004). Children are taking a central
position in the organisation of media worldwide, especially in view of
increased global mobility and interconnectivity. Interdisciplinary perspectives
on childhood involve children as contributors and negotiators and it is thus
recognised that children affects media.